diff options
author | Luke Shumaker <luke@HP-dv6426us-u904.(none)> | 2009-10-28 21:16:58 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Luke Shumaker <lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> | 2015-06-26 00:30:18 -0600 |
commit | 9efb5c3e6a370aab6fa962ab5c558437264a6fde (patch) | |
tree | abdd7184698dab2612501bc9a79454c83b60bbf6 /README | |
parent | d454c2682afbfd3e1aa98fd1be585edacd80b3c7 (diff) |
get hacking on rvs
Diffstat (limited to 'README')
-rw-r--r-- | README | 80 |
1 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +#!/usr/bin/less + + Thing(y) 0.1 -- This Hack Is Not GNU (yet?) + +The name seems really... noobish right now. The idea was that I would +fork several GNU projects, to experiment with new features, then worry +about getting them merged back into mainstream GNU later. + +This sounds dumb right now because, well, Thing doesn't include any +GNU-based packages right now. Right now it is my tinkering with +making new build/mangagement tools, perhaps one day I will use them to +work on GNU packages, or get them merged. + +I like the name because + a) it's ambiguous/random + b) the `y' at the end is optional. Sometimes I use the `y' to + hint at how much I expect it to become part of GNU + c) It's a refference to GNU's own name. + The reason it's significant that it's `not GNU' is because + I differ from GNU design principals in a few places. + Getting them merged into GNU would sometimes even require + an ammendment to the GNU Coding Standards. Although, it's + moot, because I still haven't done any GNU hacking. + +Anyway, right now Thing is mostly a build system... the one Thing +uses. I had all these (unrelated) packages, and I was tired of +patching the config and Makefiles with general changes. I got sick of +them being different, and hard to manage. So I started refactoring +them to be on the same build system. + +=How the build system works= + + `Makefile' in the top directory is a file you will use, but packages + won't know it exists. It offers several commands that can be used + to build packages: + complete-PKG_NAME - each package is not complete, there are + several files generic to all packages, this + completes the package + distclean-PKG_NAME - make that `distclean'. Actually, more + than distclean, it removes generic files + placed there by `complete-PKG_NAME' + build-PKG_NAME - build the package in the separate directory + `PACKAGE_NAME-build'. + This depends on `complete-PKG_NAME'. + This works by calling that package's Makefile + install-PKG_NAME - runs `$(MAKE) -C PKG_NAME-build install' + clean-PKG_NAME - runs `$(MAKE) -C PKG_NAME-build clean' + + complete-PKG_NAME + * This copies the following files from this directory into the + package's directory: + * configure + * COPYING + * Makefile.in + build-PKG_NAME + (depends on complete-PKG_NAME) + (`$srcdir' by default is the directory containing configure) + * This creates and cd into the directory `PKG_NAME-build' + * It runs `../PKG_NAME/configure' + * It sources the file `$srcdir/config' if it exists. This + allows for package-specific configure stuff to happen + * It scans $srcdir and subdirectories for any files with the + names: + Makefile.in + *.mk.in + * It goes through the standard Autoconf fare on these files, + and places the resulting files in the coresponding files + in `PKG_NAME-build', sans `.in' + * It runs make in the `PKG_NAME-build' directory + Yeah, this means running the generic `Makefile' generated from + `Makefile.in'. So, how do you actually get things to build? + It sources/includes `main.mk' + The generic Makefile provides several generic functions: + * target `Makefile': remakes all Makefiles + * Also generates a `*.d' file for each `*.c' file, + containing dependancies on #included header files. + * target `dist': creates a .tar.gz of the package + * target `distclean': cleans all files. This LEAVES generic + files + |