From 30a60acc14696551ccdb61d4006defcb5eea8cc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Luke T. Shumaker" <lukeshu@lukeshu.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 16:58:30 -0600
Subject: libhw_generic: Switch io.h and net.h to use result.h/error.h

---
 libhw_generic/include/libhw/generic/io.h | 34 ++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

(limited to 'libhw_generic/include/libhw/generic/io.h')

diff --git a/libhw_generic/include/libhw/generic/io.h b/libhw_generic/include/libhw/generic/io.h
index 8b3fb9c..ebbd6cb 100644
--- a/libhw_generic/include/libhw/generic/io.h
+++ b/libhw_generic/include/libhw/generic/io.h
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
 
 #include <stddef.h>    /* for size_t */
 #include <stdint.h>    /* for uintptr_t */
-#include <sys/types.h> /* for ssize_t */
 
+#include <libmisc/error.h>
 #include <libmisc/obj.h>
 
 /* structs ********************************************************************/
@@ -58,20 +58,19 @@ void io_slice_wr_to_duplex(struct duplex_iovec *dst, const struct iovec *src, in
 /* basic interfaces ***********************************************************/
 
 /**
- * Return bytes-read on success, 0 on EOF, -errno on error; a short
- * read is *not* an error.
+ * Return bytes-read on success.  A short read is *not* an error
+ * (unlike writev).
  *
  * It is invalid to call readv when the sum length of iovecs is 0.
  */
 #define io_reader_LO_IFACE \
-	LO_FUNC(ssize_t, readv, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt)
+	LO_FUNC(size_t_or_error, readv, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt)
 LO_INTERFACE(io_reader);
 #define io_readv(r, iov, iovcnt) LO_CALL(r, readv, iov, iovcnt)
 #define io_read(r, buf, count) LO_CALL(r, readv, &((struct iovec){.iov_base = buf, .iov_len = count}), 1)
 
 /**
- * Return `count` on success, -errno on error; a short write *is* an
- * error.
+ * Return bytes-written.  A short write *is* an error (unlike readv)
  *
  * Writes are *not* guaranteed to be atomic, so if you have concurrent
  * writers then you should arrange for a mutex to protect the writer.
@@ -79,38 +78,35 @@ LO_INTERFACE(io_reader);
  * It is invalid to call writev when the sum length of iovecs is 0.
  */
 #define io_writer_LO_IFACE \
-	LO_FUNC(ssize_t, writev, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt)
+	LO_FUNC(size_t_and_error, writev, const struct iovec *iov, int iovcnt)
 LO_INTERFACE(io_writer);
 #define io_writev(w, iov, iovcnt) LO_CALL(w, writev, iov, iovcnt)
 #define io_write(w, buf, count) LO_CALL(w, writev, &((struct iovec){.iov_base = buf, .iov_len = count}), 1)
 
-/**
- * Return 0 on success, -errno on error.
- */
 #define io_closer_LO_IFACE \
-	LO_FUNC(int, close)
+	LO_FUNC(error, close)
 LO_INTERFACE(io_closer);
 #define io_close(c) LO_CALL(c, close)
 
-/**
- * All methods return 0 on success, -errno on error.
- */
 #define io_bidi_closer_LO_IFACE \
 	LO_NEST(io_closer) \
-	LO_FUNC(int, close_read) \
-	LO_FUNC(int, close_write)
+	LO_FUNC(error, close_read) \
+	LO_FUNC(error, close_write)
 LO_INTERFACE(io_bidi_closer);
 #define io_close_read(c) LO_CALL(c, close_read)
 #define io_close_write(c) LO_CALL(c, close_write)
 
 /**
- * Return bytes-read and bytes-written on success, -errno on error; a
- * short read/write *is* an error.
+ * A short read/write *is* an error (like writev and unlike readv).
+ *
+ * Reads/writes are *not* guaranteed to be atomic, so if you have
+ * concurrent readers/writers then you should arrange for a mutex to
+ * protect the duplex_readwriter.
  *
  * It is invalid to call readwritev when the sum length of iovecs is 0.
  */
 #define io_duplex_readwriter_LO_IFACE \
-	LO_FUNC(void, readwritev, const struct duplex_iovec *iov, int iovcnt)
+	LO_FUNC(size_t_and_error, readwritev, const struct duplex_iovec *iov, int iovcnt)
 LO_INTERFACE(io_duplex_readwriter);
 
 #define io_readwritev(rw, iov, iovcnt) \
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-2-g168b